From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radonich v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 11, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0005 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0005 KJN P.

January 11, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis.

The application attacks a conviction issued by the Santa Cruz Superior Court. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Santa Cruz County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis; and

2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

DATED: January 11, 2011


Summaries of

Radonich v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 11, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0005 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Radonich v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Case Details

Full title:DONALD RADONICH, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 11, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0005 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2011)