From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radloff v. Clements

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03360-RPM (D. Colo. Jun. 8, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03360-RPM

06-08-2012

TIMOTHY RADLOFF, Petitioner, v. TOM CLEMENTS, Exec. Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, DICK SMELSER, Warden, Crowley County Correctional Facility, and JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General, State of Colorado, Respondents.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


STAY ORDER

Upon review of the petitioner's reply [8], filed June 7, 2012, and it appearing that the question of whether Timothy Radloff should be granted an evidentiary hearing that is the subject of an appeal to the Colorado Court of Appeals from the denial by the State District Court of the petitioner's second Rule 35(c) motion and applying the principles of comity, the state court should have the opportunity to address that issue before further proceeding in this court on the habeas corpus petition and it is therefore

ORDERED that this action is stayed pending the appeal of the petitioner's second Rule 35(c) motion.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge


Summaries of

Radloff v. Clements

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03360-RPM (D. Colo. Jun. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Radloff v. Clements

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY RADLOFF, Petitioner, v. TOM CLEMENTS, Exec. Director, Colorado…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 8, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03360-RPM (D. Colo. Jun. 8, 2012)