From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radin v. Carrow

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Jan 4, 2013
38 Misc. 3d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

No. 570905/12.

2013-01-4

Lidya Maria RADIN, Petitioner v. Daniel CARROW, Respondent–Respondent.


Petitioner appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Brenda S. Spears, J.), dated July 27, 2011, which denied her motion to be restored to possession.
Present: SCHOENFELD, J.P., SHULMAN, and HUNTER, JR., JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Order (Brenda S. Spears, J.), dated July 27, 2011, reversed, without costs, petition reinstated and matter remanded to Civil Court for further proceedings.

The hearing court erred in dismissing the underlying illegal lockout proceeding after colloquy, without taking sworn testimony or receiving evidence in admissible form. Issues concerning petitioner's occupancy status in the apartment premises and the legality of tenant-respondent's actions were not properly addressed by the informal procedure utilized below ( see Matter of Gelrod v. Levine, 24 A.D.2d 756 [1965];Mondrow v. Dexter Properties, LLC, 34 Misc.3d 131[A], 2011 N.Y. Slip Op 52346[U][App Term, 1st Dept 2011] ). In reinstating the petition, we express no view as to the substantive issues remaining to be litigated.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Radin v. Carrow

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Jan 4, 2013
38 Misc. 3d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Radin v. Carrow

Case Details

Full title:Lidya Maria Radin, Petitioner v. Daniel Carrow, Respondent-Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Jan 4, 2013

Citations

38 Misc. 3d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 50014
966 N.Y.S.2d 349

Citing Cases

Radin v. Tun

In fact, Plaintiff filed a separate action against Mr. Carrow for his alleged actions in an apartment…