From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radford v. Westbrook

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 15, 2024
2:24-CV-00025-BSM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 15, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-CV-00025-BSM

03-15-2024

TOMMY RADFORD ADC #089900 PLAINTIFF v. T. WESTBROOK, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

After careful review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 4] is adopted. Tommy Radford is allowed to proceed with his conditions of confinement claim against defendant T. Westbrook in her personal capacity only. All other claims in the complaint, see Doc. No. 2, are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and defendant Moses Jackson is dismissed without prejudice because Radford has not pled a plausible claim against him. It is certified, pursuant to 28 United States Code section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Radford v. Westbrook

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 15, 2024
2:24-CV-00025-BSM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Radford v. Westbrook

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY RADFORD ADC #089900 PLAINTIFF v. T. WESTBROOK, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 15, 2024

Citations

2:24-CV-00025-BSM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 15, 2024)