From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radford v. Norwood

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, El Dorado Division
May 18, 2010
Civil No. 08-CV-1008 (D. Kan. May. 18, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-CV-1008.

May 18, 2010


ORDER


Now on this 18th day of May, 2010, comes on for consideration the proposed findings and recommendations filed herein on April 26, 2010, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen days having passed without objections being filed by the parties, the Court hereby adopts in toto the findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time [Doc. 92] and separate Defendants Thomas and Baker's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 94] should be and are hereby denied. The Plaintiff is ordered to immediately provide his complete responses to Defendants' propounded discovery upon receipt of this order. Further withholding of discovery from Defendants may result in dismissal of Plaintiff's case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Radford v. Norwood

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, El Dorado Division
May 18, 2010
Civil No. 08-CV-1008 (D. Kan. May. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Radford v. Norwood

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY RADFORD PLAINTIFF v. CAPTAIN DAVID NORWOOD, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, El Dorado Division

Date published: May 18, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 08-CV-1008 (D. Kan. May. 18, 2010)