From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radford v. King

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 25, 2024
4:22-cv-00591-KGB-PSH (E.D. Ark. Mar. 25, 2024)

Opinion

4:22-cv-00591-KGB-PSH

03-25-2024

TOMMY LEE RADFORD ADC #089900 PLAINTIFF v. KIAMERA M. KING, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Kristine G. Baker Chief United States District Judge

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 66). Plaintiff Tommy Lee Radford has not filed any objections, and the time to file objections has passed. Accordingly, after careful consideration, the Court approves and adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendation in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects (Id.). The Court grants defendant Angela Jenkins's motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion (Dkt. No. 41). Mr. Radford's claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies (Dkt. No. 14). Because Mr. Radford may not proceed with his claims at this stage due to a failure to exhaust administrative remedies, Mr. Radford's motion for appointment of counsel is denied as moot (Dkt. No. 67).

It is so ordered


Summaries of

Radford v. King

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 25, 2024
4:22-cv-00591-KGB-PSH (E.D. Ark. Mar. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Radford v. King

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY LEE RADFORD ADC #089900 PLAINTIFF v. KIAMERA M. KING, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 25, 2024

Citations

4:22-cv-00591-KGB-PSH (E.D. Ark. Mar. 25, 2024)