From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rader v. Cnty. of Placer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 16, 2021
2:19-cv-1265 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1265 WBS AC P

11-16-2021

JACOB RADER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF PLACER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a former Auburn Main Jail detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

Before this court is plaintiff's motion to subpoena the Truckee Animal Shelter for documents related to its receipt of plaintiff's two dogs from the Placer County Sheriff's Office in June 2018. See ECF No. 19. Plaintiff states that the subpoena relates to Claim Sixteen of the first amended petition. See generally id.

On August 18, 2021, the undersigned determined that Claim Sixteen failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and recommended that it be dismissed. See ECF No. 22 at 9. The District Judge assigned to this action subsequently adopted the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 24. Discovery may not be had on a claim that has been dismissed without leave to amend.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs ex parte motion for a subpoena (ECF No. 19) is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Rader v. Cnty. of Placer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 16, 2021
2:19-cv-1265 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Rader v. Cnty. of Placer

Case Details

Full title:JACOB RADER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF PLACER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 16, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1265 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2021)