From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rademaker v. Evans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 25, 2014
No. CV 08-8486-VAP(CW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2014)

Opinion

No. CV 08-8486-VAP(CW)

11-25-2014

DAVID A. RADEMAKER, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL S. EVANS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING CORRECTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, the Report and Recommendation, the Corrected Report and Recommendation, and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection has been made. The court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: November 25, 2014

/s/_________

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rademaker v. Evans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 25, 2014
No. CV 08-8486-VAP(CW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Rademaker v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:DAVID A. RADEMAKER, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL S. EVANS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 25, 2014

Citations

No. CV 08-8486-VAP(CW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2014)