Opinion
2:23-cv-00962-CDS-EJY
07-11-2023
TIM RADECKI, Plaintiff, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE CWABS, INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-BC5, a foreign corporation; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE ENTITIES XI through XX, Defendants.
ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. NATALIE L. WINSLOW, ESQ. PAIGE L. MAGASTER, ESQ. AKERMAN LLP Attorneys for The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset- Backed Certificates, Series 2006-BC5 The Wright Law Group, P.C. JOHN HENRY WRIGHT, ESQ. Attorney for Tim Radecki
ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. NATALIE L. WINSLOW, ESQ. PAIGE L. MAGASTER, ESQ. AKERMAN LLP Attorneys for The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset- Backed Certificates, Series 2006-BC5
The Wright Law Group, P.C. JOHN HENRY WRIGHT, ESQ. Attorney for Tim Radecki
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)
Tim Radecki and The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-BC5 (BoNYM) stipulate that BoNYM shall have an additional seven (7) days, up to and including July 19, 2023, to file its response to the Radecki's complaint, which is currently due on July 12, 2023. The complaint was filed on May 24, 2023, and the case was removed to federal court on June 21, 2023.
Good cause exists to grant the requested extension. The client representative responsible for review and approval of filings on behalf of BoNYM is currently out of the office traveling and attending a trial with sporadic access to email. She will return to the office on Monday, July 17. Previously unaware of this conflict, BoNYM's counsel initially requested an extension of two weeks to respond to the complaint in this matter. An additional week is necessary to facilitate client review and approval of BoNYM's response to Radecki's complaint.
This is the parties' second request for an extension of this deadline and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.