From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radecki v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 30, 2022
2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 30, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY

11-30-2022

TIM RADECKI, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign corporation; NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; DOES I through X; and ROE ENTITIES XI through XX, inclusive, Defendants.

TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A. Krista J. Nielson, Esq. National Default Servicing Corporation THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP, P.C. John Henry Wright, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff, Tim Radecki


TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A.

Krista J. Nielson, Esq.

National Default Servicing Corporation

THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP, P.C.

John Henry Wright, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff, Tim Radecki

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiff, Tim Radecki (“Radecki”) and Defendants, National Default Servicing Corporation (“NDSC”), by and through undersigned and respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants, NDSC shall have additional time, up to and including December 12, 2022 to file its Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss. The current deadline is December 5, 2022. The parties enter into this stipulation to accommodate time and scheduling constraints on counsel for NDSC.

This is the parties' second request for an extension of this deadline and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Radecki v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 30, 2022
2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Radecki v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:TIM RADECKI, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign corporation…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 30, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 30, 2022)