From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radecki v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 31, 2022
2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY

10-31-2022

TIM RADECKI, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign corporation; NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE ENTITIES XI through XX, Defendants.

MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. AKERMAN LLP Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A. The Wright Law Group, P.C. John H. Wright JOHN HENRY WRIGHT, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff


MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. AKERMAN LLP Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A.

The Wright Law Group, P.C. John H. Wright JOHN HENRY WRIGHT, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiff Tim Radecki and defendant Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) stipulate that BANA shall have an additional thirteen days (13) days, up to and including November 16, 2022, to file its response to the plaintiff's complaint, which is currently due on November 3, 2022. The complaint was filed in state court on September 9, 2022, and removed to federal court on October 13, 2022.

Good cause exists to grant the requested extension. BANA requested the extension from plaintiff so the parties could explore settlement options.

This is the parties' second request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Radecki v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 31, 2022
2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Radecki v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:TIM RADECKI, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign corporation…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 31, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2022)