From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radecki v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 14, 2022
2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY

10-14-2022

TIM RADECKI, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign corporation; NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE ENTITIES XI through XX,

AKERMAN LLP MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A. THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP, P.C. JOHN HENRY WRIGHT, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff


AKERMAN LLP MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A.

THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP, P.C. JOHN HENRY WRIGHT, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff Tim Radecki and defendant Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) stipulate that BANA shall have an additional fourteen days (14) days, up to and including November 3, 2022, to file its response to the plaintiff's complaint, which is currently due on October 20, 2022. The complaint was filed in state court on September 9, 2022, and removed to federal court on October 13, 2022.

Good cause exists to grant the requested extension. BANA requested the extension from plaintiff so the parties could explore settlement options.

This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Radecki v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 14, 2022
2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Radecki v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:TIM RADECKI, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign corporation…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 14, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01726-ART-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 14, 2022)