From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radebaugh v. Wolfe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 12, 1897
47 P. 1101 (Okla. 1897)

Opinion

Decided: February 12, 1897.

Error from the District Court of Oklahoma County.

Amos Green Son, for plaintiff in error.

J. H. Woods, for defendant in error.


This is an action instituted by William Wolfe, plaintiff in the court below, in the district court of Oklahoma county, to obtain a mandatory injunction removing the defendant below, Samuel S. Radebaugh, from a certain quarter section of land. This case is in all respects similar to the Woodruff-Wallace case, ( 3 Okla. 355), and the decision of the lower court was in harmony with the decision therein, and that case must control in the one under consideration. Upon the authority of Woodruff v. Wallace, supra, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Radebaugh v. Wolfe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 12, 1897
47 P. 1101 (Okla. 1897)
Case details for

Radebaugh v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL S. RADEBAUGH v. WILLIAM WOLFE

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 12, 1897

Citations

47 P. 1101 (Okla. 1897)
47 P. 1101

Citing Cases

Barnett v. Ruyle

Mrs. Ruyle's contest, even if it had been competent to prove it, was one for a preference right only, and…