From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Racond v. Racond

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 14, 1993
627 So. 2d 1329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 93-347.

December 14, 1993.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Celeste Hardee Muir, Judge.

Abrams Abrams, and Brenda M. Abrams, Coconut Grove, and Jeannie M. Etter, Miami, for appellant.

Richard J. Burton, Dania, and Deborah Marks, North Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.


Affirmed. We find no error in the trial court's denial of the motion to set aside the dissolution agreement. As recognized by the trial court, counsel, and this court, appellant may seek modification of the agreement upon his retirement pursuant to section 61.14, Florida Statutes (1991).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Racond v. Racond

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 14, 1993
627 So. 2d 1329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Racond v. Racond

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE RACOND, APPELLANT, v. CAROLINE STEINBERG RACOND, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 14, 1993

Citations

627 So. 2d 1329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)