From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raciti v. City of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 2003
307 A.D.2d 309 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-03321

Submitted May 27, 2003.

July 21, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered February 25, 2002, which granted the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 4401, made at the close of her evidence, to dismiss the complaint.

Raymond J. Keegan Assoc., LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Jeffrey J. Keegan of counsel), for appellant.

William M. Mooney III, Corporation Counsel, Yonkers, N.Y. (Rory McCormick of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court correctly granted the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 to dismiss the complaint. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, there was no rational process by which the jury could have found in her favor ( see Szczerbiak v. Pilat, 90 N.Y.2d 553, 556; Colon v. Ladalia, 301 A.D.2d 621) . The plaintiff failed to present any evidence that, under the circumstances of this case, the conduct of the defendant's employees fell "below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk" ( Morris v. Troy Sav. Bank, 32 A.D.2d 237, 238, affd 28 N.Y.2d 619; see McLean v. Triboro Coach Corp., 302 N.Y. 49, 51).

RITTER, J.P., FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Raciti v. City of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 2003
307 A.D.2d 309 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Raciti v. City of Yonkers

Case Details

Full title:MARIA DANIELLA RACITI, ETC., appellant, v. CITY OF YONKERS, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 21, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 309 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 519

Citing Cases

Portillo v. State

Claimant has the burden of proving the State liable for negligence by a fair preponderance of the credible…

De Mattei v. State

Claimant has the burden of proving the State liable for negligence by a fair preponderance of the credible…