From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Racine & Assocs. v. Murphy (In re Murphy)

United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Michigan
Apr 20, 2023
No. 22-44506 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Apr. 20, 2023)

Opinion

22-44506 Adv. 22-4314

04-20-2023

In re:CHERYL LEEANN MURPHY, Debtor. v. CHERYL LEEANN MURPHY, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM SUPPLEMENTING THE COURT'S APRIL 19, 2023 BENCH OPINION REGARDING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THOMAS J. TUCKER, BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

This adversary proceeding came before the Court for a telephonic hearing on April 19, 2023, on the Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket # 25, the "Motion"). Counsel for each of the parties appeared and was heard. At the end of the hearing, the Court gave an oral bench opinion, stating and explaining the Court's ruling on the Motion. After the hearing, on April 19, 2023, the Court entered a detailed Order, granting the Motion. (Docket # 43).

The Memorandum supplements the Court's April 19, 2023 oral bench opinion, with the following.

First, with respect to the Court's ruling that the Plaintiff's nondischargeability claim under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) is premature and does not present a live case or controversy, the Court now cites the following recent case that further supports its ruling: Medeiros v. Firth (In re Firth), Case No. 21-00213-ELG, 2023 WL 162140 at **2-3 (Bankr. D. D.C. Jan. 11, 2023).

Second, in further support of the Court's ruling about Count III of Plaintiff's Complaint (the count alleging that Plaintiff has a lien in the proceeds of Defendant-Debtor's settlement), namely, that Count III must be dismissed because it is barred by the confirmed plan in the Defendant-Debtor's pending Chapter 13 case, the Court notes the following.

There is an additional reason why the Debtor's confirmed plan bars the Plaintiff's claim to have a lien/secured claim. The confirmed plan (Docket # 24 in Case No. 22-44506, at pdf p. 12, section V.O) provides, consistent with the default rule under 11 U.S.C. § 1327(b), that on the Effective Date of the plan, all property of the bankruptcy estate vests in the Debtor. (The order confirming plan, Docket # 53 in Case No. 22-44506, did not say otherwise.) Under Bankruptcy Code section 1327(c), such property "is free and clear of any claim or interest of any creditor provided for by the plan." 11 U.S.C. § 1327(b). (The order confirming plan did not say otherwise.) The Plaintiff's claim is provided for by the plan, in Class Nine, as a creditor holding an allowed general unsecured claim. So all property of the bankruptcy estate, which now has been vested back in the Debtor, is "free and clear" of any claimed attorney lien or other lien that the Plaintiff may ever have had.


Summaries of

Racine & Assocs. v. Murphy (In re Murphy)

United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Michigan
Apr 20, 2023
No. 22-44506 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Apr. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Racine & Assocs. v. Murphy (In re Murphy)

Case Details

Full title:In re:CHERYL LEEANN MURPHY, Debtor. v. CHERYL LEEANN MURPHY, Defendant.

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Michigan

Date published: Apr 20, 2023

Citations

No. 22-44506 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Apr. 20, 2023)