Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Rabek v. Kellum

2 Citing cases

  1. Taylor v. Taylor

    283 Ga. 63 (Ga. 2008)   Cited 9 times
    Affirming trial court's decision as to how to equitably distribute retirement accounts based on, among other things, evidence of the wife's earning potential

    "The law is well-settled that retirement benefits acquired during the marriage are marital property subject to equitable division. [Cits.]" Rabek v. Kellum, 279 Ga. 709, 711 ( 620 SE2d 387) (2005). See also Courtney v. Courtney, 256 Ga. 97, 99 (2) ( 344 SE2d 421) (1986).

  2. Coursey v. Coursey

    787 S.E.2d 199 (Ga. 2016)

    See Shaw v. Shaw , 290 Ga. 354, 720 S.E.2d 614 (2012). “The law is well-settled that retirement benefits acquired during the marriage are marital property subject to equitable division.” Rabek v. Kellum , 279 Ga. 709, 711, 620 S.E.2d 387 (2005). See also Hipps v. Hipps , 278 Ga. 49, 597 S.E.2d 359 (2004).