From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RABB v. GATOR MACHINERY COMPANY

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 23, 2011
2:10-CR-00698-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 23, 2011)

Opinion

2:10-CR-00698-PMP-PAL.

February 23, 2011


ORDER


On December 28, 2010, the Court entered an Order (Doc. #39) granting Gator Machinery Inc.'s Renewed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. #25) and denying Plaintiff's Counter Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint (Doc. #31). Additionally, the Court denied Defendant COSCO Container Lines Americas Inc.'s Joinder in Defendant Gator's Motion to Dismiss to the extent it sought dismissal based upon lack of jurisdiction.

Recently, however, it has been brought to the attention of the Court by a letter filed on behalf of Defendant COSCO that the Court's Order (Doc. #39) did not address Defendant COSCO's alternate basis for dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant COSCO is correct, and the Court has now had the opportunity to revisit the motion to address this latter aspect of Defendant COSCO's motion. Having done so, the Court finds that Plaintiff has in his Complaint sufficiently stated plausible claims for Negligence, Negligence Per Se and Strict Liability.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant COSCO's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. #32) is DENIED.

DATED: February 23, 2011.


Summaries of

RABB v. GATOR MACHINERY COMPANY

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 23, 2011
2:10-CR-00698-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 23, 2011)
Case details for

RABB v. GATOR MACHINERY COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:JOE RABB, Plaintiff, v. GATOR MACHINERY COMPANY, INC., a foreign…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Feb 23, 2011

Citations

2:10-CR-00698-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 23, 2011)