From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ra-Bey ex rel. Smith v. Phila. Dep't of Prisons I.E.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Mar 17, 2020
No. 5 EM 2020 (Pa. Mar. 17, 2020)

Opinion

No. 5 EM 2020

03-17-2020

TETI AMUN RA-BEY EX RELATIONE [SMITH, CARL], Petitioner v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS I.E. [PHILADELPHIA INDUSTRIAL CORRECTIONS CENTER] D/B/A WARDEN MICHELLE FERRELL PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS D/B/A TIMIKA LANE, JUDGE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA D/B/A ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY MIKE MCFARLAND, Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2020, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the "Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum" are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.


Summaries of

Ra-Bey ex rel. Smith v. Phila. Dep't of Prisons I.E.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Mar 17, 2020
No. 5 EM 2020 (Pa. Mar. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Ra-Bey ex rel. Smith v. Phila. Dep't of Prisons I.E.

Case Details

Full title:TETI AMUN RA-BEY EX RELATIONE [SMITH, CARL], Petitioner v. PHILADELPHIA…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 17, 2020

Citations

No. 5 EM 2020 (Pa. Mar. 17, 2020)