holding that the filing of two different false documents in the same transaction constituted two crimes under 18 U.S.C. § 1010
Summary of this case from McLean v. U.S.No. 335.
October 19, 1964.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Richard M. White and Thomas H. Anderson for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States. Reported below: 329 F. 2d 860.
holding that the filing of two different false documents in the same transaction constituted two crimes under 18 U.S.C. § 1010
Summary of this case from McLean v. U.S.upholding award of photocopying costs
Summary of this case from Haagen-Dazs v. Double Rainbow Gourmet Icefiling two different false documents in same transaction constitutes two crimes under 18 U.S.C. § 1010, which makes it an offense to knowingly make false statements in an FHA loan application
Summary of this case from United States v. GuzmanFull title:R. H. WRIGHT, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 19, 1964
See, e. g., In re Western Liquid Asphalt Cases, 487 F.2d 191, 199 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S.…
Schwimmer v. Sony Corp. of AmericaWhile courts frequently focus on the purpose of the antitrust conspiracy, specifically whether it was "aimed…