From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R A Guthrie Co. v. Boparai

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 25, 2021
Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-080-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-080-ALM-KPJ

03-25-2021

R A GUTHRIE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. SUKHMINDER BOPARAI and PATCH MAGIC, LLC, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 1, 2021, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (the "Report") (Dkt. #42) that Plaintiff R A Guthrie Company, Inc.'s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (the "Motion") (Dkt. #26) be granted in part and denied in part.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, Plaintiff R A Guthrie Company, Inc.'s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (the "Motion") (Dkt. #26) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court will enter Final Default Judgment under separate cover.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 25th day of March, 2021.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

R A Guthrie Co. v. Boparai

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 25, 2021
Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-080-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2021)
Case details for

R A Guthrie Co. v. Boparai

Case Details

Full title:R A GUTHRIE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. SUKHMINDER BOPARAI and PATCH…

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 25, 2021

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-080-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2021)

Citing Cases

Motionware Enters. v. The Individuals

While the undersigned agrees that Motionware is entitled to statutory damages and indeed, is obliged to award…

Hydraflow Indus. NZ v. The Individuals

, Hydraflow's requested damages of $150,000 per Defaulting Defendant is excessive. R A Guthrie Co., Inc. v.…