Qureshi v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Aguirre v. State

    NO. 02-16-00032-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2016)

    Likewise, Aguirre did not object to the prosecutor's remarks during opening and closing statements. See Estrada v. State, 313 S.W.3d 274, 302-03 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (requiring preservation of error regarding complaints about prosecutor's opening and closing arguments), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1142 (2011); Qureshi v. State, No. 02-15-00367-CR, 2016 WL 5957019, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 13, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) ("Texas courts have repeatedly held that th[e] preservation requirement applies to a complaint concerning an opening statement; without an objection, the complaint is forfeited."). Therefore, he has failed to preserve his complaints for our review, and we overrule all of his issues.