From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quittman v. Nemarow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1968
31 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

November 12, 1968


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered April 1, 1968, which denied appellants' motion to consolidate or to direct a joint trial of the actions. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by (1) striking from the decretal paragraph the words "In all respects" and (2) inserting therein, after the words "said motion shall be and the same is hereby", the following: "granted to the extent of directing a joint trial of the action brought by plaintiff Quittman with the cause for assault in the action brought by plaintiffs Nemarow and otherwise" [denied]. As so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellants. The alleged assaults took place as part of a single occurrence and necessarily involve common questions. Since we do not herewith order the cause for slander to be tried with the assault causes, it does not appear that Quittman can be prejudiced by the joint trial herewith ordered (CPLR 602, subd. [a]; cf. Pace v. New York City Tr. Auth., 19 A.D.2d 630). Beldock, P.J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Quittman v. Nemarow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1968
31 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Quittman v. Nemarow

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL QUITTMAN, Respondent, v. CHARLES NEMAROW, Appellant. (Action No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1968

Citations

31 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Perina v. State

The order should, therefore, have been granted to the extent of directing a joint trial of Actions Nos. 2 and…