From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quirk v. Woods

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Jul 14, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-68 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-68

07-14-2014

JOSHUA QUIRK v. MITCH WOODS, et al.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Joshua Quirk, a former pre-trial detainee at the Jefferson County Correctional Facility, proceeding in forma pauperis, filed the present civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Bruce Minter, Robert Stegall and Coy Randle.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends defendant Bruce Minter's motion for summary judgment be denied.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.

__________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Quirk v. Woods

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Jul 14, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-68 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Quirk v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA QUIRK v. MITCH WOODS, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Jul 14, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-68 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2014)