From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quirion v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Maine
Feb 1, 2005
Civil No. 05-06-B-W, Criminal No. 03-21-B-W (D. Me. Feb. 1, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-06-B-W, Criminal No. 03-21-B-W.

February 1, 2005

ROBERT EARL QUIRION, WHITE DEER, PA, PRO SE, Petitioner.

MARGARET D. McGAUGHEY, OFFICE OF THE U.S., ATTORNEY, DISTRICT OF MAINE, PORTLAND, ME, for Respondent, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE


The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 14, 2005 her Recommended Decision. The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on January 31, 2005. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

Quirion v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Maine
Feb 1, 2005
Civil No. 05-06-B-W, Criminal No. 03-21-B-W (D. Me. Feb. 1, 2005)
Case details for

Quirion v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT EARL QUIRION, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: Feb 1, 2005

Citations

Civil No. 05-06-B-W, Criminal No. 03-21-B-W (D. Me. Feb. 1, 2005)

Citing Cases

Shafer v. U.S.

And while the First Circuit has not yet issued a published opinion on this topic, the non-retroactivity…

Robinson v. U.S.

Certainly, there is no dispute in this district that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Booker relief is not available to cases…