From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintuna v. Citibank

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 7, 2022
22-cv-2711 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 7, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-2711 (LJL)

06-07-2022

ANGEL YUMBLA QUINTUNA, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge:

The Court has received the proposed notice of voluntary dismissal as to Defendant Citibank, N.A., pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Dkt. No. 12. Rule 41 addresses dismissal of actions rather than dismissal of parties. Treating the application as addressed to the Court's power under Rule 15 or Rule 21 or its inherent power, the Court will dismiss the complaint as against Defendant Citibank, N.A. with prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Defendant Citibank, N.A.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Quintuna v. Citibank

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 7, 2022
22-cv-2711 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Quintuna v. Citibank

Case Details

Full title:ANGEL YUMBLA QUINTUNA, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., TRANS UNION, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 7, 2022

Citations

22-cv-2711 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 7, 2022)