From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintero v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 12, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01849-AP (D. Colo. Dec. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01849-AP

12-12-2012

CYNTHIA QUINTERO Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff : Michael W. Seckar For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J. BENEDICT GARCÍA Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado THAYNE WARNER Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:
Michael W. Seckar
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
THAYNE WARNER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: July 16, 2012

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: No record of date of service.

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: November 19, 2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate. However, the Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement the record if necessary at the time of the Opening Brief.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters anticipated.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: January 21, 2013

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: February 20, 2013

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: March 7, 2013

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: Michael W. Seckar
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
Telephone (719) 543-8636
E-mail: seckarlaw@mindspring.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov
By: _____________
M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: (303) 844-7237
thayne.warner@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant


Summaries of

Quintero v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 12, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01849-AP (D. Colo. Dec. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Quintero v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA QUINTERO Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 12, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01849-AP (D. Colo. Dec. 12, 2012)