From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintero v. Aranas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 29, 2019
Case No. 3:17-cv-00066-MMD-CBC (D. Nev. May. 29, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-cv-00066-MMD-CBC

05-29-2019

JOHN QUINTERO, Plaintiff, v. ROMEO ARANAS, et al., Defendants.

AARON D. FORD Attorney General GERRI LYNN HARDCASTLE, Bar No. 13142 Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Bureau of Litigation Public Safety Division 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701-4717 Tel: (775) 684-1134 E-mail: ghardcastle@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants


AARON D. FORD

Attorney General
GERRI LYNN HARDCASTLE, Bar No. 13142

Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Bureau of Litigation
Public Safety Division
100 N. Carson Street
Carson City, NV 89701-4717
Tel: (775) 684-1134
E-mail: ghardcastle@ag.nv.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF STAY AND MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE 90-DAY STAY REPORT

Defendants, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Gerri Lynn Hardcastle, Deputy Attorney General, hereby move this Court to enlarge the stay and the time for the Office of the Attorney General to file the 90-day stay report in this matter.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This case is a pro se civil rights matter pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 9 at 1. Plaintiff, John Quintero (Plaintiff), is an inmate in the lawful custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC). Id. On February 26, 2019, this Honorable Court screened Plaintiff's case and allowed certain claims to proceed. Id. at 22-24. This Court also stayed Plaintiff's case for ninety (90) days for the parties to negotiate settlement and to participate in an inmate early mediation conference (EMC). Id. at 24. At the conclusion of the stay—which, according to the calculations of Defendants' counsel, would be on or about May 28, 2019—the Court ordered the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) to file a stay report.

The EMC in this matter is scheduled for July 23, 2019. ECF No. 11 at 1. Because the EMC is scheduled to take place after the expiration of the stay, Defendants respectfully request this Court enlarge the stay and the time to file the 90-day stay report until Friday, July 26, 2019.

II. LEGAL STANDARD

District courts have inherent power to control their dockets. Hamilton Copper & Steel Corp. v. Primary Steel, Inc., 898 F.2d 1428, 1429 (9th Cir. 1990); Oliva v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 272, 273 (9th Cir. 1992). Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) governs enlargements of time and provides as follows:

When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time: (A) with or without motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires; or (B) on motion made after the time has expired if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect.

"The proper procedure, when additional time for any purpose is needed, is to present to the Court a timely request for an extension before the time fixed has expired (i.e., a request presented before the time then fixed for the purpose in question has expired)." Canup v. Miss. Valley Barge Line Co., 31 F.R.D. 282, 283 (D. Pa. 1962). The Canup Court explained that "the practicalities of life" (such as an attorney's "conflicting professional engagements" or personal commitments such as vacations, family activities, illnesses, or death) often necessitate an enlargement of time to comply with a court deadline. Id. Extensions of time "usually are granted upon a showing of good cause, if timely made." Creedon v. Taubman, 8 F.R.D. 268, 269 (D. Ohio 1947). The good cause standard considers a party's diligence in seeking the continuance or extension. See, e.g., Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992).

III. DISCUSSION

Here, the stay is scheduled to expire and the stay report must be filed today, May 28, 2019. However, the EMC is not scheduled to take place until July 23, 2019. Good cause therefore exists to grant Defendants' motion, because the parties have not yet had the opportunity to mediate these cases and mediation is the primary purpose of the stay. / / / / / / / / /

IV. CONCLUSION

Because the EMC in this matter is not scheduled to take place until July 23, 2019, Defendants respectfully request this Honorable Court grant their motion and enlarge the stay and the time for the OAG to file the 90-day stay report until Friday, July 26, 2019.

DATED this 28th day of May, 2019.

AARON D. FORD

Attorney General

By: /s/_________

GERRI LYNN HARDCASTLE

Deputy Attorney General

State of Nevada

Bureau of Litigation

Public Safety Division

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED

/s/ _________

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DATED: 5/29/2019


Summaries of

Quintero v. Aranas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 29, 2019
Case No. 3:17-cv-00066-MMD-CBC (D. Nev. May. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Quintero v. Aranas

Case Details

Full title:JOHN QUINTERO, Plaintiff, v. ROMEO ARANAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: May 29, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:17-cv-00066-MMD-CBC (D. Nev. May. 29, 2019)