From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintanar v. Lizarraga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 27, 2019
Case No. 2:19-CV-00054-VAP (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-CV-00054-VAP (SK)

06-27-2019

JESSE ANTHONY QUINTANAR, Petitioner, v. JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER (1) ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY HABEAS PETITION AND (2) DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the relevant records, and the attached Report and Recommendation to deny the Petition. The time for objections has passed with none filed. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. The Court also finds, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Petition be DENIED, and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability be DENIED. DATED: June 27, 2019

/s/_________

HON. VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Quintanar v. Lizarraga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 27, 2019
Case No. 2:19-CV-00054-VAP (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2019)
Case details for

Quintanar v. Lizarraga

Case Details

Full title:JESSE ANTHONY QUINTANAR, Petitioner, v. JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 27, 2019

Citations

Case No. 2:19-CV-00054-VAP (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2019)