From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintana v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 1, 2010
No. CIV S-09-3221 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3221 FCD KJM P.

December 1, 2010


ORDER


On October 19, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed October 6, 2010, denying appointment of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed October 6, 2010, is affirmed.

DATED: November 30, 2010.


Summaries of

Quintana v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 1, 2010
No. CIV S-09-3221 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Quintana v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR QUINTANA, Plaintiff, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 1, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3221 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2010)