From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintana v. Reynal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 20, 1960
11 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

September 20, 1960


Order, dated April 13, 1960, denying defendant's motion to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. It cannot be said that the amended complaint does not allege a joint venture. In such event the Statute of Frauds would not be applicable.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.


Summaries of

Quintana v. Reynal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 20, 1960
11 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

Quintana v. Reynal

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL I. QUINTANA, Respondent, v. WILLIAM J. REYNAL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 20, 1960

Citations

11 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)