From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintana v. Mei

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 96 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 13, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Allen Saks, J.).


Since the record discloses the existence of factual issues respecting whether defendants, in the course of removing snow and ice accumulations on the public sidewalk abutting their residence, either created or heightened the hazard that is alleged to have caused plaintiff's fall and injury, defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied ( see, Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Quintana v. Mei

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 96 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Quintana v. Mei

Case Details

Full title:BIENVENIDA QUINTANA, Respondent, v. HENRY MEI et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 13, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 96 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 282

Citing Cases

Rebell v. Emigrant Savings Bank

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.). Summary judgment was properly denied as to…