From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintana v. McCoy

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 29, 2006
9:03-CV-0924 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2006)

Opinion

9:03-CV-0924.

September 29, 2006


DECISION ORDER


This action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, was referred by this Court to the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c).

No objections to the Report-Recommendation dated September 7, 2006 have been filed. After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein.

It is therefore, ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Quintana v. McCoy

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 29, 2006
9:03-CV-0924 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Quintana v. McCoy

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS QUINTANA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH E. McCOY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Sep 29, 2006

Citations

9:03-CV-0924 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2006)

Citing Cases

Varricchio v. County of Nassau

Courts in the Second Circuit have recognized that "depriving an inmate of food or serving him contaminated…

Poole v. Nassau Cnty.

"Courts in the Second Circuit have recognized that 'depriving an inmate of food or serving him contaminated…