From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintana v. Espinosa

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 22, 2011
No. CIV-S-09-3221 KJM DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-09-3221 KJM DAD (TEMP) P.

April 22, 2011


ORDER


On February 25, 2011, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action be pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: April 21, 2011.


Summaries of

Quintana v. Espinosa

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 22, 2011
No. CIV-S-09-3221 KJM DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Quintana v. Espinosa

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR QUINTANA, Plaintiff, v. ERIC ESPINOSA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 22, 2011

Citations

No. CIV-S-09-3221 KJM DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)