Opinion
2:21 -cv-00023-CDS-NJK
10-19-2022
SARA QUINTANA, Plaintiff, v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; and the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, in their official capacities, Defendants.
JAMES R. OLSON, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 000116 WALTER R. CANNON, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 001505 STEPHANIE A. BARKER, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 003176 OLSON CANNON GORMLEY & STOBERSKI 9950 WEST CHEYENNE AVENUE AND CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT KEMP & KEMP JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ. VICTORIA L. NEAL, ESQ. AND AND GILBERT EMPLOYMENT LAW, PC JAMES A. HILL, ESQ. CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ. PRO HAC VICE - ECF 24 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
JAMES R. OLSON, ESQ.
NEVADA BAR NO. 000116
WALTER R. CANNON, ESQ.
NEVADA BAR NO. 001505
STEPHANIE A. BARKER, ESQ.
NEVADA BAR NO. 003176
OLSON CANNON GORMLEY & STOBERSKI 9950 WEST CHEYENNE AVENUE
AND
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ.
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
KEMP & KEMP
JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ.
VICTORIA L. NEAL, ESQ.
AND AND
GILBERT EMPLOYMENT LAW, PC
JAMES A. HILL, ESQ. CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ.
PRO HAC VICE - ECF 24
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE (THIRD REQUEST)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Defendants CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (CCSD) and the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (BOT) through their attorneys WALTER R. CANNON, ESQ. and STEPHANIE A. BARKER, ESQ. of the law firm of OLSON CANNON GORMLEY & STOBERSKI, and CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ. of the OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL FOR THE CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; and by Plaintiff SARA QUINTANA through her attorneys JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ. of the law firm KEMP & KEMP, and JAMES A. HILL, ESQ. of the law firm GILBERT EMPLOYMENT LAW, P.C., that the dispositive motion deadline in this matter be extended for an additional fourteen (14) days. This is the parties THIRD post-discovery request for extension of the dispositive motion deadline, submitted for the below-stated reasons.
On June 3, 2022, the parties entered a Stipulation to Extend the Dispositive Motion Deadline (SECOND) to a date to be scheduled 30 days after Settlement Conference. (ECF No. 48.) The Court granted that Stipulation on June 6, 2022. (ECF No. 49.) On September 22, 2021 the parties participated in a Settlement Conference with United States Magistrate Judge Youchah (see ECF No. 50 and ECF No. 51), and were unable to reach resolution. Accordingly, the Court scheduled the dispositive motion deadline for October 22, 2022. (ECF No. 52.)
The parties now enter into this third Stipulation to extend the dispositive motion deadline for an additional fourteen (14) at the request of defense counsel in order to accommodate conflicts in attorney Barker's schedule associated with birth of a grandchild.
Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the current dispositive motion deadline of October 22, 2022, to November 4,2022. This is the parties THIRD stipulation concerning the dispositive motion deadline.
IT IS SO ORDERED.