From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintana v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 29, 2022
2:21-cv-00023-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00023-CDS-NJK

04-29-2022

SARA QUINTANA, Plaintiff, v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; and the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, in their official capacities, Defendants.

JAMES R. OLSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 000116 WALTER R. CANNON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 001505 STEPHANIE A. BARKER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 003176 OLSON CANNON GORMLEY & STOBERSKI AND CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 012396 Attorney for DEFENDANTS Clark County School District and Board of Trustees of the Clark County School District GILBERT EMPLOYMENT LAW, PC JAMES A. HILL, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff KEMP & KEMP JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6375 VICTORIA L. NEAL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13382 Attorneys for Plaintiff


JAMES R. OLSON, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 000116

WALTER R. CANNON, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 001505

STEPHANIE A. BARKER, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 003176

OLSON CANNON GORMLEY & STOBERSKI

AND

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 012396

Attorney for DEFENDANTS

Clark County School District and Board of Trustees of the Clark County School District

GILBERT EMPLOYMENT LAW, PC

JAMES A. HILL, ESQ.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

KEMP & KEMP

JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 6375

VICTORIA L. NEAL, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 13382

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE (45 DAYS) (FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Defendants CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (CCSD) and the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (BOT) through their attorneys WALTER R. CANNON, ESQ. and STEPHANIE A. BARKER, ESQ. of the law firm of OLSON CANNON GORMLEY & STOBERSKI, and CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ. of the OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL FOR THE CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; and by Plaintiff SARA QUINTANA through her attorneys JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ. and VICTORIA L. NEAL, ESQ. of the law firm KEMP & KEMP, and JAMES A. HILL, ESQ. of the law firm GILBERT EMPLOYMENT LAW, P.C., that the dispositive motion deadline in this matter be extended for 45 days. This is the parties FIRST post-discovery request for extension of the dispositive motion deadline.

Discovery closed on April 4, 2022. The dispositive Motion deadline is May 4, 2022 (ECF No. 40). The parties have taken five depositions and exchanged hundreds of pages of documentation in the past three months. Plaintiffs final document disclosure was emailed on April 4, 2022. The record is extensive, and in part, was recently disclosed. In reliance on these records, Defendants intend to file a Motion for Summary Judgment. In addition, the parties are exploring the possibility of settlement conference and wish to avoid incurring attorney fees and costs associated with preparing dispositive motions if settlement is a possibility.

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to a 45-day extension of time to submit dispositive motions, moving the deadline from May 4, 2022, to June 17, 2022.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Quintana v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 29, 2022
2:21-cv-00023-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Quintana v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:SARA QUINTANA, Plaintiff, v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a political…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 29, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-00023-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 29, 2022)