From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintana v. Adams

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 12, 2005
119 F. App'x 163 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Jose Quintana, Corcoran, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Lisa M. Bassis, Los Angeles, CA, Michelle A. Des Jardins, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellee. D.C. No. CV-01-08930-HLH.


Before: HUG, T.G. NELSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed December 3, 2003 is hereby AMENDED. The Clerk shall file the attached Amended Memorandum Disposition.

With this amendment, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED. No subsequent petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.


Summaries of

Quintana v. Adams

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 12, 2005
119 F. App'x 163 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

Quintana v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:Jose QUINTANA, Petitioner--Appellant, v. Derrel G. ADAMS, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 12, 2005

Citations

119 F. App'x 163 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

Grigoryan v. Keisler

A previous screening panel of this court concluded that substantial evidence supported the agency's finding…