From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quinn v. James

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jul 2, 2009
1:09CV176 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 2, 2009)

Opinion

1:09CV176.

July 2, 2009


ORDER


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on March 18, 2009, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint [Doc. 2] be, and the same is hereby, DISMISSED for being frivolous or malicious or for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. 7] be DENIED for lack of good cause. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Quinn v. James

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jul 2, 2009
1:09CV176 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Quinn v. James

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD NATHANIEL QUINN, Plaintiff, v. MAJOR WAYNE JAMES, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Jul 2, 2009

Citations

1:09CV176 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 2, 2009)