Opinion
19952-22
02-23-2023
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge
This case is before the Court on petitioners' Motion to Proceed Remotely, filed October 17, 2022. That motion does not contain a signature by petitioners or by a practitioner admitted to practice before this Court. The Court will therefore deny petitioners' motion without prejudice, petitioners may refile a properly signed Motion to Proceed Remotely for the Court's consideration.
Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Proceed Remotely, filed October 17, 2022, is denied without prejudice.