Quinlan v. Hazel

Full title: ROSE QUINLAN, as Administratrix of the Estate of JAMES QUINLAN, Plaintiff…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 3, 2005

Civil Action No. 04-485 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-485.

December 3, 2005

ORDER

GARY LANCASTER, District Judge

AND NOW, this 3^rd day of Dec, 2005, after the plaintiff, Rose Quinlan, as Administratrix of the Estate of James Quinlan, filed a Third Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint was filed by defendant, John J. Kane Regional Centers-Glen Hazel, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by defendant, and the response to those objections filed by plaintiff, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint [Docket No. 11] is DENIED.