Opinion
2:21-cv-01612-MCE-JDP
06-02-2022
GIORGIO QUINIONES, Plaintiff, v. LG CHEM, LTD., and the FIRST DOE through the FIFTIETH DOE, inclusive, Defendants.
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, TREVOR J. INGOLD, JENNIE I. LEE, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP, RACHEL ATKIN HEDLEY, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendant LG CHEM, LTD.
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, TREVOR J. INGOLD, JENNIE I. LEE, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP, RACHEL ATKIN HEDLEY, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendant LG CHEM, LTD.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LG CHEM, LTD.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ITS REPLY BRIEF AND LEAVE TO EXCEED THE PAGE LIMIT
HON. MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS MATTER having come before this Court on Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.'s (“LG Chem”) Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File its Reply Brief and Leave to Exceed the Page Limit, and this Court having reviewed the aforementioned motion:
Having reviewed the materials submitted, and the files and records herein, this Court is fully informed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant LG Chem, Ltd.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File its Reply Brief and Leave to Exceed the Page Limit is GRANTED. LG Chem, Ltd.'s time to file a Reply Brief in further support of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is extended to June 10, 2022. LG Chem, Ltd. may exceed the page limit for its Reply Brief to file up to 15 pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.