The denial of relief was affirmed on appeal. Quince v. State , No. SC11-2401, 2012 WL 6197458, at *1–2 (Fla. Dec. 10, 2012) (116 So.3d 1262 (table) ), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 2695, 189 L.Ed.2d 743 (2014). Section 921.137 requires a defendant to establish his or her intellectual disability by demonstrating the following three factors: (1) significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning; (2) concurrent deficits in adaptive behavior; and (3) manifestation of the condition before age eighteen.
The denial of relief was affirmed on appeal. Quince v. State, No. SC11-2401, 2012 WL 6197458, at *1-2 (Fla. Dec. 10, 2012) (116 So. 3d 1262 (table)). Section 921.137 requires a defendant to establish his or her intellectual disability by demonstrating the following three factors: (1) significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning; (2) concurrent deficits in adaptive behavior; and (3) manifestation of the condition before age eighteen.
We also affirmed the denial of a successive motion for postconviction relief, in which Quince sought to vacate his death sentence on the ground that he is ineligible for the death penalty due to intellectual disability. Quince v. State, No. SC11-2401, 2012 WL 6197458, at *1–2 (Fla. Dec. 10, 2012) (116 So.3d 1262 (table) ). On January 9, 2017, Quince filed another successive motion for postconviction relief in light of Hurst v. Florida, ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), which is the subject of this appeal.