In Quinby (supra) recovery against the judgment debtor as one of the conspirators in a tortious conspiracy to interfere with the execution was allowed.
Summary of this case from James v. PowellArgued October 27, 1882
Decided November 21, 1882
Winchester Britton for appellant.
Louis F. Grant for respondents.
DANFORTH, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Quinby (supra) recovery against the judgment debtor as one of the conspirators in a tortious conspiracy to interfere with the execution was allowed.
Summary of this case from James v. PowellFull title:JAMES M. QUINBY et al., Respondents, v . JOSEPH H. STRAUSS, Impleaded…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 21, 1882
The plaintiffs further assert correctly that a cause of action for unlawful interference with enforcement of…
James v. PowellHowever, while the complaint is no model of the pleader's art, it is quite clear that relief is sought not…