Summary
dismissing complaint without prejudice for lack of diversity jurisdiction and giving plaintiff ten days to file an amended complaint
Summary of this case from Amerisure Mutual Insurance v. Carey TransportationOpinion
Civil No. 05-1841-SU.
April 10, 2006
Freddie Busby Quimby Baker City, Oregon Pro Se Plaintiff
Michael J. Bird Brown Hughes Bird Rote Wetmore Brouhard Grants Pass, Oregon Attorney for Defendants
ORDER
The Honorable Patricia Sullivan, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on March 16, 2006. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation (#13).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#4) is granted. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint asserting a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction within ten (10) days of this Order.