From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quillian v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 21, 1964
163 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 63-834.

April 21, 1964.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Jack M. Turner, J.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and W. Eugene Neill, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

James W. Kynes, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Victor V. Andreevsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and CARROLL and TILLMAN PEARSON, JJ.


W.J. Quillian, under life sentence for a 1933 armed robbery conviction, appeals an order denying without formal hearing his motion to vacate judgment and sentence, under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, which was predicated, among other grounds, on the allegation he was indigent and denied counsel at trial.

The record shows there were three defendants. One pleaded guilty. Quillian and the other pleaded not guilty, were tried and convicted. The record discloses there were two defense attorneys who took part in the trial. It can not be determined from the record whether either of the named attorneys actually represented the appellant.

The allegation of absence of counsel for the defendant is not conclusively refuted by the files and record of the case, and for that reason the matter should be heard on notice in the trial court. See Branch v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 162 So.2d 528; Caminata v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 159 So.2d 921, and cases cited therein.

Accordingly the order appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings as provided for in Rule 1 and as indicated above.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Quillian v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 21, 1964
163 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Quillian v. State

Case Details

Full title:W.J. QUILLIAN, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 21, 1964

Citations

163 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

This we feel is not sufficient to show that this appellant was actually represented by counsel at the trial.…

Gentry v. State

Ordinarily, in a case of this nature this court would approve the action of the trial court in denying a…