Opinion
Argued February 27, 1891
Decided March 17, 1891
Hamilton Harris for appellant.
Hugh L. Cole for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Quill v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 17, 1891
126 N.Y. 629 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Quill v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 17, 1891
126 N.Y. 629 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Quill v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.
Case Details
Full title:JOHN QUILL, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v . THE NEW YORK CENTRAL…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 17, 1891
Citations
126 N.Y. 629 (N.Y. 1891)
Citing Cases
Harris v. District of Columbia
Mr. Rossa F. Downing, for Harris, discussed the following cases: Weightman v. Corporation of Washington, 1…
Curry v. City of Highland ParkBefore taking up our own decisions, we shall consider some of the decisions of other States, and first those…