From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quiles v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 24, 1983
97 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

October 24, 1983


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., based, inter alia, on the theories of breach of warranty, strict products liability and negligence, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Goldberg, J.), dated January 12, 1983, as granted that branch of the motion of defendant Staley Elevator Co., Inc., as sought summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' complaint as against it, and (2) so much of a judgment of the same court, entered January 31, 1983, as dismissed their complaint against said defendant. Appeal from the order dated January 12, 1983 dismissed. (See Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248.) Judgment entered January 31, 1983 affirmed, insofar as appealed from. Respondent is awarded one bill of costs. We note that the respondent had no control over, or connection with, the allegedly defective elevator for 16 years prior to the occurrence. Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Quiles v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 24, 1983
97 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Quiles v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:FERDIDA M. QUILES, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, CARMEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 24, 1983

Citations

97 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Werner v. Treeline 400 GCP, LLC

Here, plaintiff, who fails to offer any explanation for the cause of her accident, points to no such…

Vogel v. Herk Elevator Co.

It is undisputed that Otis repaired one of the main switches of the travolator approximately…