From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quijano v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 16, 2018
NO. CV 14-716-GW (KS) (C.D. Cal. May. 16, 2018)

Opinion

NO. CV 14-716-GW (KS)

05-16-2018

MARIA QUIJANO, Petitioner, v. DERRAL ADAMS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), all of the records herein, the Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. // // // //

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: May 16, 2018

/s/_________

GEORGE H. WU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Quijano v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 16, 2018
NO. CV 14-716-GW (KS) (C.D. Cal. May. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Quijano v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:MARIA QUIJANO, Petitioner, v. DERRAL ADAMS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 16, 2018

Citations

NO. CV 14-716-GW (KS) (C.D. Cal. May. 16, 2018)