From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quick v. Quinn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 11, 2014
No. 9:12-CV-1529 (DNH/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2014)

Summary

finding support for Jeffreys exception where the plaintiff failed to respond to the defendant's claim that he was not working on the day of the incident

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Jenkins

Opinion

No. 9:12-CV-1529 (DNH/DEP)

09-11-2014

DESMOND QUICK, Plaintiff, v. JOHN QUINN, Lieutenant, Auburn Correctional Facility; CHRIS NOVACK, Correctional Officer, Auburn Correctional Facility; SEAN REILLY, Correctional Officer, Auburn Correctional Facility; and JOSEPH BANEY, Correctional Officer, Auburn Correctional Facility, Defendants.

APPEARANCES: DESMOND QUICK Plaintiff, pro se 03-B-1945 Marcy Correctional Facility P.O. Box 3600 Marcy, NY 13403 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendants The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 OF COUNSEL: RACHEL M. KISH, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General


APPEARANCES: DESMOND QUICK
Plaintiff, pro se
03-B-1945
Marcy Correctional Facility
P.O. Box 3600
Marcy, NY 13403
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorney for Defendants
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
OF COUNSEL: RACHEL M. KISH, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Desmond Quick brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 11, 2014, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' motion for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims against defendant Reilly be granted based upon lack of personal involvement. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Sean Reilly are DISMISSED;

3. This matter is referred back to Magistrate David E. Peebles for further proceedings consistent with this Decision and Order; and

4. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

United States District Judge
Dated: September 11, 2014

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

Quick v. Quinn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 11, 2014
No. 9:12-CV-1529 (DNH/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2014)

finding support for Jeffreys exception where the plaintiff failed to respond to the defendant's claim that he was not working on the day of the incident

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Jenkins
Case details for

Quick v. Quinn

Case Details

Full title:DESMOND QUICK, Plaintiff, v. JOHN QUINN, Lieutenant, Auburn Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 11, 2014

Citations

No. 9:12-CV-1529 (DNH/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2014)

Citing Cases

Stevens v. Duquette

However, the Second Circuit recognized an exception to this rule in Jeffreys v. City of New York, 426 F.3d…

Simpson v. Price

In Jeffreys, the court held that summary judgment may be granted in the rare case, “where there is nothing…