From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quick v. Cochran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 6, 2013
CIVIL ACTION 13-0085-CB-M (S.D. Ala. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 13-0085-CB-M

05-06-2013

ROSSTON N. QUICK, Plaintiff, v. SAM COCHRAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to obey the Court's Order.

The Magistrate Judge recommended that this action be dismissed because Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court's order that he file a signed copy of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. That order was mailed to Plaintiff and was not returned. The Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at the same address and was returned as undeliverable.

Charles R. Butler ,Jr.

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Quick v. Cochran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 6, 2013
CIVIL ACTION 13-0085-CB-M (S.D. Ala. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Quick v. Cochran

Case Details

Full title:ROSSTON N. QUICK, Plaintiff, v. SAM COCHRAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 13-0085-CB-M (S.D. Ala. May. 6, 2013)